Transformational Leadership and Conflict Management in Zanzibar

Main Article Content

Mohammed Bakari
Alexander Boniface Makulilo

Abstract

Zanzibar has had a turbulent political history for more than half a century, from the time of nationalist struggles in the 1950s. The major bone of contestation has revolved around the politics of identity with its resultant long-standing political conflict. In November 2009, the then President of Zanzibar, Amani Abeid Karume from Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM), and the Civic United Front (CUF) Secretary-General, Seif Shariff Hamad met and declared their commitment in public to end the long-standing political conflict between the two main political parties on the islands. This article seeks to explain the process of reconciliation in Zanzibar with specific reference to the role of leadership in transformational change. The study was conducted between March 2015 and February 2017, involving two main data collection methods: in-depth interviews and documentary reviews. Interviews were conducted with politicians, government functionaries, academics, journalists, and leaders of civil society organizations. The study found that the only substantive achievements that were realized in the short run were power-sharing under the Government of National Unity (GNU) and some changes in attitudes among some of the key political actors, which, to a certain degree, amounted to a discourse switch from a hostile political attitude based on zero-sum politics to the recognition of the need for cooperation across party lines. The uniqueness of the power-sharing arrangement in Zanzibar was that the system was entrenched in the constitution. The constitution was negotiated and established before the election. The theory of transformational change suggests that transformational leaders tend to have a strong personal attachment to their missions. Their absence in the course of implementation may sometimes negatively impact the transformation process, even in the context where the mission has been translated within the legal and constitutional framework. The case of Zanzibar indicates a pressing need for deepening the power-sharing deal so that it becomes people-centered rather than a mere elite project entrenched in partisan politics.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Mohammed Bakari, & Alexander Boniface Makulilo. (2022). Transformational Leadership and Conflict Management in Zanzibar. PanAfrican Journal of Governance and Development (PJGD), 3(1), 135-162. https://doi.org/10.46404/panjogov.v3i1.3579
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Mohammed Bakari, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Mohammed Bakari is Associate Professor of Political Science at the Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of Dar es Salaam. He works on democracy, governance, development, constitutionalism, peace and security. Professor Bakari is the author of an influential work on Zanzibar’s politics titled “The Democratization Process in Zanzibar: A Retarded Transition” published in 2001 by the Institute of African Affairs, Hamburg, Germany.

Alexander Boniface Makulilo, University of Dodoma, Tanzania

Alexander Makulilo is a Professor of Political Science at the Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of Dodoma. His research focuses on comparative politics, governance, democracy, public opinion, constitutionalism, development, gender, peace and security. Professor Makulilo has researched and published widely in the areas of his specialization. His most recent work is a Co-edited book (with Professor Frederick Muyia Nafukho - Texas A & amp; M University, USA) in March 2021 titled Handbook of Research on Nurturing Industrial Economy for Africa’s Development, IGI Global Publishing, USA.

References

Bakari, M. A. (2001). The democratization process in Zanzibar: A retarded transition. Hamburg: Institute of African Studies.
Bakari, M. A., & Makulilo, A. (2012). Beyond polarity in Zanzibar? The ‘Silent’ referendum and the government of national unity. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 30(2), 197–198.
Bass, B. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, N.J: Eribaum Associates.
Brown, A. (2010). Political tensions in Zanzibar: Echoes from the revolution? Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 30(3–4), 615–633.
Galtung, J., & Fischer, D. (2004). Conflict transformation by peaceful means (The Transcend Method). New York: United Nations Disaster Management Programme. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32481-9_5
Glassman, J. (2011). War of words, war of stones: Racial thought and violence in colonial Zanzibar. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Harrington, C. B., & Engle Merry, S. (2018). Ideological Production: The Making of Community Mediation. In C. Menkel-Meadow (Ed.), Mediation: Theory, Policy and Practice (pp. 501–527). Carrie Menkel-Meadow: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204826-19
Hay, C. (2002). Political analysis: A critical introduction. Hampshire: Palgrave.
Heilman, B. (2004). The second muafaka: a ceasefire or conflict resolution? The African Review: A Journal of African Politics, Development and International Affairs, 31(1–2), 39–62. Retrieved from http://196.44.162.39/index.php/ar/article/view/224
Ingrams, W. H. (1967). Zanzibar: Its history and its people. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kaiser, P. G. (1999). Power sovereignty and international election observers: The case of Zanzibar. Africa Today, 46(1), 29–46.
Killian, B. (2008). The state and identity politics in Zanzibar: Challenges to democratic consolidation in Tanzania. African Identities, 6(2), 99–125.
Lijphart, A. (2008). Thinking about democracy: power-sharing and majority rule in theory and practice. New York: Routledge.
Lofchie, M. (1965). Zanzibar: Background to revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mapuri, O. R. (1996). The 1964 revolution: Achievements and prospects. Dar es salaam: TEMA Publishers.
Matheson, A. (2012). Maridhiano: Zanzibar’s remarkable reconciliation and government of national unity. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 6(4), 591–612.
Mmuya, M., & Chaligha, A. (1994). Political parties and democracy in Tanzania. Dar es salaam: Dar es Salaam University Press.
Moss, S. M., & Tronvoll, K. (2015). We are all Zanzibari! Identity formation and political reconciliation in Zanzibar. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 9(1), 91–109.
Mrina, B. F., & Matoke, W. T. (1980). Mapambano ya ukombozi Zanzibar. Dar es Salaam: Tanzania Publishing House.
Mukangara, D. (2000). Race, ethnicity, religion, and politics in Zanzibar. In T.L. Malyamkono, Ed. The Political Plight of Zanzibar. Dar es salaam: TEMA Publishers Company Ltd.
Nassor, A. S., & Jose, J. (2014). Power-sharing in Zanzibar: from zero-sum politics to democratic consensus? Journal of Southern African Studies, 40(2), 247–265.
Northrup, T. A. (1989). The dynamic of identity in personal and social conflict. In Terrell Northrup and Louis Kriesberg, (Eds), Intractable conflicts and their transformation (pp. 55–82). Syracuse, N.Y: Syracuse University Press.
Othman, H. (1993). Zanzibar’s political history: The past haunting the present? Copenhagen, Denmark: The Center for Development Research.
Rubin, J., Pruitt, D., & Kim, S. H. (1994). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate and settlement. United States: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Sheriff, A. (1994). The union and the struggle for democracy in Zanzibar. In R. Mukandala and H. Othman (Eds.) Liberalization and Politics: The 1990 Elections in Tanzania. Dar es salaam: Dar es Salaam University Press.
Sheriff, A. (2001). Race and class in the politics of Zanzibar. Africa Spectrum, 36(3), 301–318.
Shivji, I. (2008). Pan-Africanism or pragmatism: Lessons from Tanganyika-Zanzibar Union. Dar es salaam: Mkuki na Nyota.
Stedman, S. J. (1997). Spoiler problems in peace processes. International Security, 22(2), 5–53.
Vayrynen, R. (1991). To settle or to transform? Perspectives on the resolution of national and international conflicts. In Raimo Vayrynen, (Ed.), New Directions in Conflict Theory: Conflict Resolution and Conflict Transformation. London: Sage.